Consensus

Static Computer-Aided Implant Surgery (s-CAIS) Analysing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), Economics, and Complications

Consensus Statements

Consensus Statement 1: s-CAIS is not beneficial compared with conventional implant surgery in terms of pain & discomfort, economics, and intraoperative complications

It cannot be stated that s-CAIS, in terms of pain & discomfort, economics, and intraoperative complications, is beneficial compared with conventional implant surgery. This Consensus Statement is based on four RCTs, four prospective Cohort Studies, five retrospective Cohort Studies, and one Case Series.

Clinical Recommendations

1) There is no contraindication to use s-CAIS instead of conventional implant surgery

Based on PROMs, economics, and complications, there is no contraindication to use s-CAIS instead of conventional implant surgery.

2) Flapless s-CAIS may be beneficial in fully edentulous cases

Flapless s-CAIS may be beneficial in fully edentulous cases in relation to postoperative pain intensity compared with open-flap procedures.

3) The quality and quantity of the keratinized mucosa must be assessed before planning s-CAIS

Flapless s-CAIS may lead to implant placement outside the zone of keratinized mucosa; therefore, the quality and quantity of the keratinized mucosa must be assessed before planning s-CAIS.

Downloads and References

  • 6th ITI Consensus Conference
  • Consensus Statement
  • English
  • Languages
  • Surgical Planning & Procedures

ITI QR code Mvc

Share this page

Download the QR code with a link to this page and use it in your presentations or share it on social media.

Download QR code
QR code